Is Running a Sport?

I got into this argument with some friends recently. Most of us were runners, and most of those vehemently defended their perception of running as a sport.

Others denied it the title for reasons as superficial as its lack of a court, gear, and most tellingly, a ball. All sports have special equipment. And most non-runners would agree that running requires no skill. This latter idea abounds amongst the participants of “real” sports like baseball, football, and soccer. After all, anyone can run, right?

This debate got me thinking, and I came to the conclusion that running is not a sport.

Put down your pitchforks and extinguish your torches. I do not agree that it isn’t a sport for any of the silly reasons above. My argument rests on the fact that sports by definition require competition. And any time running involves competition, it becomes racing. So, while racing is a sport, running is not.

Please don’t get me wrong. Many runners feel compelled to defend running as a sport because they feel the label gives it validity and recognizes its difficulty. After all, many argue that it’s not a sport because they think that it doesn’t require skill or that it isn’t difficult. These are preposterous. I, on the other hand, argue that running is potentially harder than any sport, and that it is so precisely because of the characteristics that distinguish it from that time-honored title.

In any sport, the competition is between you and someone else. Your might against theirs. And there’s always a point where your might proves greater or lesser. At that point you need exert yourself no more. The demands placed on you are limited to your opponent’s abilities.

Wrestling, for example, is a sport that I highly respect (real wrestling, not the WWF crap). It locks its participants in a contest of wills, and it typically involves a long, wearying struggle– things that distance runners can understand. The difference is that it’s over as soon as you prove to be the stronger or weaker competitor.

In serious distance running, however, the demands placed on your are limited to your own abilities. When you run (whether training or racing) to the upmost of your abilities, your only limit is full-body failure.

There is no interpersonal competition in running– we specialize in beating ourselves into the ground. To do that, we need no gear, no ball, no ESPN covers. We don’t even need talent. All we need is to push ourselves harder than the rules, harder than the boundaries allowed by any sport.

Share on Facebook
Comments
  • Joan says:

    You are right! Running is something we are genetically programmed to do for survival. Whether or not we choose to torture ourselves while doing so is another matter. Love the picture.

  • Dan Way says:

    I’ll agree that running only becomes a sport when competition is involved but disagree with your semantics that it must be called racing. I am competitive and thus an essential part of my running is the race…thus to me, running is a sport. But I would never say that my sport is racing! Racing what? Cars, canoes, chickens?! Additionally, for those who run for general health and fitness and never run in official races, I bet many would argue that they compete against themselves and still consider running to be their ‘sport’. Ultimately, arguing the definition of sport is futile since there is no perfect definition.

    • Turtlerunner says:

      Hah, sorry if that seemed like a semantic cop-out. IMHO, sports require strictly interpersonal competition. When I get passed by a 60-year-old in a 5k, I feel like he beat me in the sport of racing. There’s a much deeper, more challenging, intrapersonal conflict going on inside my head– wussing out vs. speeding up– but that’s not the sport. That’s happening at an entirely different level.

      But your reaction to the word “racing” makes sense. Even competitive runners are referred to as… well… runners.

Leave a Comment